Letter to the Senate Regarding Appropriations Increasing Funds for Federal Prisons

See the PDF Version.

Eliminate Funding for Prison Expansion and Reinvest in Justice Programs that Divert People from Incarceration

October 31, 2011

Dear Senator:

The undersigned organizations are concerned about legislation pending in the Senate to fund Commerce, Justice, Science and Related Agencies. Specifically, the legislation increases funds for federal prisons, including new prison expansion, while cutting and/or eliminating programs proven to reduce incarceration and recidivism, support at-risk youth in leading law abiding lives, as well as save money on corrections. This week, as you are considering this legislation for a vote, we urge you to avoid spending scarce federal funds on costly prison expansion and instead invest resources in programs that prevent crime and help keep people out of prison. Programs already authorized under the Second Chance Act are but one example of cost-effective efforts to reduce crime and the prison population at the same time.

We share the concerns about the severe overcrowding that plagues BOP facilities and agree prompt action must be taken to address dangerous overcrowding and staff shortages. However, we believe opening more prisons is not the answer. Rather, it is simply a continuation of a costly and failed criminal justice strategy that states and local governments around the country have already rejected in favor of sentencing reform and alternative approaches to incarceration. Congress should implement sound sentencing reform policies that relieve overcrowding, ensure fairness and reduce costs.

Over the last 30 years, the size of the federal prison system has exploded largely due to excessive mandatory minimum sentences and the war on drugs. Today 217,000 people are in federal prisons and over half are there for drug offenses as their most serious offense. The prison population has increased 800% in 30 years and the cost to run it has grown by 1760%. Continuing this wasteful and counterproductive prison build-up contradicts criminological research about what works to prevent crime, and ignores the successful reforms happening in corrections at the state level that have allowed systems facing similar crowding and fiscal pressures to reduce costs, reduce incarceration and protect public safety.

Indeed, the Second Chance Act, signed by President George W. Bush with bipartisan support in 2008, supports exactly the kind of programming that reform-minded states across the country have embraced. It helps individuals transition from prison to communities by providing drug treatment services, job training and mentoring services, among other assistance. The federal investment goes to evidence-based programs that are proven to reduce recidivism and can lead to a reduction in the prison population. Thus, while we continue to advocate for the Second Chance Act to be fully funded, we were nevertheless pleased with the strong support its programs received from House appropriators.

There are also many practical, cost-saving measures that Congress could and should take to reduce the existing prison population as well. In a report to Congress drafted by the National Institute of Corrections, "Estimated Effects of Potential Prison Reform," the BOP outlined several alternatives to prison building that would address prison overcrowding. We support these cost saving proposals and ask that they be incorporated into the final FY2012 CJS Appropriations bill. Here are just a few examples:

  • Good Time Conduct Credits - Federal law could be modified to allow a prisoner who is serving a term of imprisonment of more than one year, but not a term of life imprisonment, to receive credit toward the service of the prisoner's sentence of up to 54 days for each year of the sentence imposed. This change would extend good time credits for federal prisoners by 7 days per year, enhance incentives for good behavior and provide an immediate reduction in the population growth by 4,000, saving $41 million in the first year alone.
  • Elderly Offender Pilot Expansion - The Second Chance Act of 2007 directed the BOP to pilot a program to place eligible elderly offenders on home detention for those at least 65 years old who have served 10 years or 75 % of their imposed sentence. Given the low recidivism risk of elderly prisoners, the home confinement provision should be made permanent and the eligibility criteria should be modified by lowering both the age and sentence-length requirements.
  • Expanded Early Release for Program Completion - Legislation should be enacted to provide early release credit for successful participation in recidivism-reducing programs such as Federal Prison Industries, vocational training, and education. This expansion would likely increase participation in reentry programs, decrease prison misconduct and thereby increase safety for staff and inmates and lower costs.

Congress must act to change the course of unchecked incarceration and its enormous human and fiscal costs. Instead of funding new prisons while cutting proven programs that divert people from prison and produce better community outcomes, Congress should take the sensible steps BOP itself has highlighted and provide adequate funding for programs that can lead to a reduction in the number of people in prison overall.

In any final bill that is negotiated and voted on by Congress, we urge the inclusion of funding for the Second Chance Act and other justice programs designed to keep people out of prisons, jails and juvenile facilities and the elimination of new funding to expand prison capacity. More sound alternatives are available to address federal prison crowding.

Sincerely,

See the PDF Version for the List of Signers.

About Us
Sign Up
Donate

Press Room »

Events »

Blogs »

Work at FCNL »

Programs for
Young Adults »

Email Options »

© 2014 FCNL | 245 Second St, NE, Washington, DC 20002
202-547-6000 | Toll Free 800-630-1330