14 Members of Congress Urge Obama to Reconsider Troop Escalation

Mar 26, 2009

On March 16, a bi-partisan group of 14 members of Congress sent a letter to Obama urging him to reconsider escalating troop levels in Afghanistan. More than 17 national advocacy organizations endorsed the letter. You can find the letter that FCNL faxed to every member of the House here.

The letter to Obama is shown below:


March 16, 2009

Dear Mr. President:

We have noted with some concern your announcement that an additional 17,000 US troops would be sent to Afghanistan. As the goals of our seven year military involvement remain troublingly unclear, we urge you to reconsider such a military escalation.

If the intent is to leave behind a stable Afghanistan capable of governing itself, this military escalation may well be counterproductive. A recent study by the Carnegie Endowment has concluded that "the only meaningful way to halt the insurgency's momentum is to start withdrawing troops. The presence of foreign troops is the most important element driving the resurgence of the Taliban."

The 2001 authorization to use military force in Afghanistan allowed military action "to prevent any future acts of international terrorism against the United States." Continuing to fight a counterinsurgency war in Afghanistan does not appear to us to be in keeping with these directives and an escalation may actually harm US security.

In a tape released in 2004, Osama bin Laden stated that al Qaedas' goal was to "bleed.. .America to the point of bankruptcy" in Afghanistan. He continued, "All that we have to do is to send two mujahedeen to the furthest point east to raise a piece of cloth on which is written al Qaeda, in order to make generals race there to cause America to suffer human, economic and political losses without their achieving anything of note. . . ." We would do well to pay attention to these
threats and to avoid falling into any such trap through escalation of our military presence in Afghanistan.

We are also concerned that any perceived military success in Afghanistan might create pressure to increase military activity in Pakistan. This could very well lead to dangerous destabilization in the region and would increase hostility toward the United States.

Mr. President, in reviewing the past history of Afghanistan and the nations that have failed to conquer it -- Russia spent nine years in Afghanistan and lost many billions of dollars and more than 15,000 Russian soldiers-- we urge you to reconsider the decision to send an additional 17,000 troops and to resist pressure to escalate even further.

Sincerely,

Rep. Neil Abercrombie (HI-1)
Rep. Roscoe Bartlett (MD-6)
Rep. Howard Coble (NC-6)
Rep. John Conyers (MI-14)
Rep. John J. Duncan, Jr. (TN-2)
Rep. Bob Filner (CA-51)
Rep. Michael Michaud (ME-2)
Rep. Walter Jones, Jr. (NC-3)
Rep. Steve Kagen (WI-8)
Rep. Marcy Kaptur (OH-9)
Rep. Dennis J. Kucinich (OH-10)
Rep. James P. McGovern (MA-3)
Rep. Ron E. Paul (TX-14)
Rep. Ed Whitfield (KY-1) PDF Version